• 回复
  • 收藏
  • 点赞
  • 分享
  • 发新帖

讨论:做110V输入的电子镇流器用倍压方式和不倍压方式的优缺点

讨论:做110V输入的电子镇流器用倍压方式和不倍压方式的优缺点
倍压应该简单方便一点,不倍压电流比较大,但也有很多不倍压的,讨论一下吧!
全部回复(8)
正序查看
倒序查看
crysnake
LV.2
2
2003-12-19 13:50
就是看你的侧重点了!
效率和成本本身就是一对矛盾,所以关键看你的取舍!
0
回复
kenny
LV.5
3
2003-12-21 14:31
现在国内的价格越压越底,推荐单电解
````
0
回复
sjhongs
LV.2
4
2004-01-31 23:55
看线路结构而定
半桥结构用倍压,推挽的用普通桥整
0
回复
2004-02-01 15:56
it depend on...
in fact, it depend on the requirments,such as cost ,topology.in china, we often use 230V line voltage, so half-bridge is much more popular. if you want to use push-pull, the swiching transistors must have a abilty of high reverse Vce.so it is not so good as half-bridge.the flowing is more often seen in china:
using half-bridge, general speaking under the case of line voltage 230V, the ballast at most can handle 3 lamps. if the line voltage is 120V, we would like to use push-pull and the ballast can drive more lamps than half bridge. this point is often seen in us model ballast.
0
回复
king2
LV.4
6
2005-03-09 16:54
我认为还是用倍压的好,线路简单.
0
回复
lancefeng
LV.4
7
2005-03-09 17:10
@king2
我认为还是用倍压的好,线路简单.
倍压容易做好.
0
回复
2005-03-09 20:54
@lancefeng
倍压容易做好.
有没有高功率因素的无源电路啊,
0
回复
oldsailer
LV.4
9
2005-03-10 20:49
@kenny
现在国内的价格越压越底,推荐单电解````
同意,另外一体灯还得考虑体积因素,所以不倍压是趋势,而且现在针对120V的低压三极管也很多,象华微的41××L系列,扬晶DK4×系列,不过不倍压做大功率灯现在还有难度.
0
回复